Obama’s terrorist co-chairman

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

J. Michael Sharman
Published: October 13, 2008

Beginning in 1995, Barack Obama and Bill Ayers served together on the board of the Annenberg Challenge Project. Before it closed in 2003, CNN reports, it had given hundreds of thousands of dollars to social change projects promoted by Ayers.  1

Ayers was the person responsible for getting the Annenberg grant for Chicago. 2 He was one of the three founders of the Project. 3 The Project’s minutes note that Ayers and Obama wrote its bylaws together. 4 Ayers was the co-chair of the Project’s “Collaborative”, which shaped its educational policy. 5

In 1995, a few months after Obama became chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, his political career began when state Sen. Alice Palmer introduced Obama to a dozen-or-so folks gathered in the Hyde Park living room of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn as the person to take her place in the Illinois State Senate. 6

In 1997, Obama wrote a glowing review in the Chicago Tribune for one of Ayers’ books. 7 CNN also reported that he was listed with Ayers as a panelist at a forum organized by his wife, Michelle Obama. 8

From 1999 to 2001 9 , Ayers and Obama also served together on the board of the Woods Foundation of Chicago, and grants were made from it to Obama’s church, Trinity United Church of Christ, and to the Children and Family Justice Center, which is run by Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dohrn. 10

So why, during an April 2008 debate with Hillary Clinton, did Obama claim that he knew Ayers simply “as a guy who lives in my neighborhood?” 11
William “Bill” Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn first met in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1967. Until recently, though, she was the more famous of the two, mainly because of her incendiary speeches: In 1969, when Charlie Manson went on his killing spree, Dohrn told an SDS rally, “Dig it! Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach.”  12

It was she who made the public announcement on May 21, 1970: “Hello. This is Bernardine Dohrn. I’m going to read a declaration of a state of war. This is the first communication from the Weatherman Underground. … Within the next 14 days, we will attack a symbol or institution of Amerikan injustice.” 13

In 1970, Ayers’ then-girlfriend, Diana Oughton, and two other people were killed in a bombmaking accident in Greenwich Village. Ayers went underground. By that time, Bernadine Dorhn was on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List” 14, and the Weather Underground 15 was listed as a “Domestic Terrorist Organization” by the FBI. 16

Ayers and Dohrn have three children: In 1977 they had Zayd Atheola, named after a Black Panther killed in a shootout with police four years earlier; In 1980 they had Malik Cochise, named after Malcolm X and the Apache war chief; and Chesa, Kathy Boudin’s son, has been raised by Dohrn and Ayers since his mother was jailed for a Brinks robbery when he was 14 months old.  17

In an August 22, 1996 PBS interview with Dorhn and Ayers, they were asked by interviewer Elizabeth Brackett, “As you look back now, the bombings, what the Weathermen did claim credit for, would you do it differently now?” Ayers said, “I doubt it…[W]hat we did was certainly serious and had consequences for us personally, but I don’t think it was, it was anything that was uncalled for. I mean, I think it was called for.”

Dorhn answered, “The movement was never not into violence.” 18

On September 11, 2001, in an incredible ironic coincidence of timing, under the headline, “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives”, The New York Times published an interview with Bill Ayers that had this now-famous opening line:  “‘I don’t regret setting bombs,‘’ Bill Ayers said. ‘I feel we didn’t do enough.’” 19

The NYT interviewer reminded Ayers that in 1970 he had summed up the Weatherman creed by saying, “Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at.” He told her, “It was a joke about the distribution of wealth.”

The reason for the NYT interview was to launch Ayers’ new book, “Fugitive Days”, in which he admitted participating in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972.

“Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon,” he wrote.

In his book, Ayers also claimed responsibility for breaking Timothy Leary out of jail. Writer Richard Stern, reports of another prison break Ayers was involved in: during dinner with Dohrn and Ayers, Ayers was describing to Stern how “they’d gotten Eldridge Cleaver from a California prison to a Morocco haven” before Dohrn stopped him from saying more. 20

After Malik’s birth in 1980, they decided to come out of hiding. Their Federal charges had been dropped years earlier due to prosecutorial misconduct, and Dorhn pleaded guilty to reduced state charges and got a fine and three years probation. A few months later, when she was asked to testify about Kathy Boudin’s Brinks robbery, she claimed she knew nothing about it. The feds then asked for a writing sample, Dorhn refused, and she was given 7 months for refusing to testify. “I felt grand juries were illegal and coercive,” said Dorhn, a law school graduate. 21

It was during a jail furlough that Dorhn and Ayers married. 22

The August 2001 issue of Chicago Magazine had an article about Ayers titled “No Regrets” accompanied by a posed photo of Ayers in an urban alleyway, nonchalantly standing on a crumbled American flag.

In that month before 9/11, the article recites his past of domestic terrorism and reports: “This—violence, death, and white-hot rhetoric—is his past and Ayers insists he has no regrets. ‘I acted appropriately in the context of those times,’ he says.”  23

Three days after 9/11, David Horowitz wrote of an interview he did with Ayers ten years before: “Ayers reviewed his activities as a terrorist for my tape recorder. When he was done, he broke into a broad, Jack Horner grin and summed up his experience: ‘Guilty as hell. Free as a bird. America is a great country.’” 24

In 2003, the film “The Weather Underground”, with interviews of Dorhn, Ayers, and two other Weather Underground members, was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary.

In a January 2004 interview of Dorn and Ayers posted on the film’s website, they were asked, “Would you do it again under similar circumstances?”

Ayers answered, “Being almost 60, it’s impossible to not have lots and lots of regrets about lots and lots of things, but the question of did we do something that was horrendous, awful?… I don’t think so.”

Dorhn’s answer was, “At the end of the day, I feel like we were lucky to be in that history. We were lucky to be in that history. We were lucky to be in that moment where there was hope and a sense of libratory possibility.”  25

In 2006, Bill Ayers took his fourth trip to Venezuela to speak to educational “reformers” who are part of Hugo Chavez’ Bolivarian Revolution. On Ayers’ website is the content of his speech. He said, “We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution…” He encouraged them to “continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane… Capitalism promotes racism and militarism – turning people into consumers, not citizens.”

In Spanish, Ayers told his fellow reformers, “La educacion es revolucion! Viva Presidente Chavez! Viva La Revolucion Bolivariana! Hasta La Victoria Siempre!” 26

Chairman Obama. Co-Chairman Ayers. They are more than simply two guys who live in the same neighborhood.


J. Michael Sharman is an independent columnist who practices law in Culpeper. His column appears Tuesdays in the Star-Exponent. 

1 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/obama.ayers/
2 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/05/fact-check-is-obama-palling-around-with-terrorists/
3 Kurtz, Stanley “Founding Brothers: What’s behind Obama’s early rise?” Sep 24, 2008 http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTM4ZmU1NGFkODJlMjhmYjkxMjg4Y2Q0NTVlYjAzMmY=
4 Chicago Annenberg Challenge Board Of Directors Minutes, 3/15/95
5 Kurtz, Stanley “Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools” Wall Street Journal, Sep 23, 2008
6 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/obama.ayers/
7 Chicago Tribune, 12/21/97
8 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/obama.ayers/
9 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/05/fact-check-is-obama-palling-around-with-terrorists/
10 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/obama.ayers/
11 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/obama.ayers/
12 Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001
13 http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/pacificaviet/scheertranscript.html
14 Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
15 “The FBI’s analysis of its motivations, beliefs, and international travels are outlined in this summary.” http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/weather.htm
16 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/05/fact-check-is-obama-palling-around-with-terrorists/
17 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/weather/radicals_8-22.html, TALES FROM THE UNDERGROUND, AUGUST 22, 1996, TRANSCRIPT; and Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
18 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/weather/radicals_8-22.html, TALES FROM THE UNDERGROUND, AUGUST 22, 1996, TRANSCRIPT
19 Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
20 http://rossdouthat.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/the_william_ayers_he_knows.php
21 Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
22 Smith, Dinitia “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen”, The New York Times, September 11, 2001 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE 1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
23 Coburn, Marcia “No Regrets” Chicago Magazine, August 2001 http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/
24 Horowitz, David “Allies in War”, FrontPageMagazine.com , September 14, 2001 http://www.islet.org/horowitz/20010914.htm
25 “The Weather Underground: Exclusive Interview : Bernadine Dorhn and Bill Ayers” , January 2004 http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/weatherunderground/interview.html
26 http://billayers.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/world-education-forum/

 

 

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( El Debibble ) on October 16, 2008 at 11:33 am

sillywoman, (clear and direct name calling) I am not calling Sharman’s facts into question. I am calling his CONCLUSIONS, as well as yours into question.  Why can’t you get that into your head?  My assertion that you are logically inconsistent is based on how obvious you make it your posts.  You can’t rant all you want but the proof is in you posts.  You still have provided no clear or factual DATA (references that may or may not be correct). I am not calling Sharman’s facts into question. I am calling his CONCLUSIONS, as well as yours, into question.  Why can’t you get that?  I am saying that a presentation of your conclusion would not hold up in front of a jury.

You found a fact and then you built a story around it.  IF the story cannot be supported, which it can’t THEN you’re story is faulty.  Part of your faulty logic is that you are unwilling to apply to other who have supported Ayers or been invovled with him the same logic and standards that you demand be applied to Obama.  Instead you would rather try to dismiss the questions which is typical of koolaid drinkers from either side.

“owning” you in court is not a threat.  It is an estimate of how foolish you would look when I finished busting your conclusions into little pieces. You are reaching.  Just like you are with the following:

I can spell bettter than you.  I can’t type. So what?

Feel free to point out the misuse of words.  Odds are they came from my inability to type.

It is not naive to accuse you of being biased and blind since if you REALLY cared you would look it up. You don’t and you won’t and it doesn’t matter what you do for a living.  My refusing to provide you such easy to find data just proves it.  If you had accused me of what I just accused you of I would be hunting it to see if maybe I should admit I might be wrong, or in you case just shut up since I doubt you will admit to being wrong .  I found it.  I went as far as to tell you WHAT to look for. Shouldn’t that indicate there might be something out there that contradicts the conclusions reached by Sharman’s “facts” ? BTW - they are references, not neccesarily facts.

Your insistence that “THE FACT AT HAND WAS THAT THE MONEY WENT TO A KNOWN TERRORIST AS FUNNELED THROUGH THE HANDS OF OBAMA, NOT WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM OR WHO ELSE THEY MAY HAVE SUPPORTED” is not important is utterly ridiculous.  You are completely hypocritical to carry on about Obama and terrorosts while ignoring that those of your own party have the same associations. 

I believe you insinuated that I was lying about voting for McCain.  I was just more clear in my accusations toward you.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( El Debibble ) on October 16, 2008 at 11:02 am

Copper, I can’t find anywhere that they took credit for bombing the police station or that they wer accused.  Help me out.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( OrdinaryWoman ) on October 16, 2008 at 10:19 am

(El debibble words are in lower case, OrdinaryWoman’s are in upper case for her response)
POSTED 10/16:  Ordinarywoman, there is no way you would ever be a judge, judgemental yes, judge no. JUST MORE NAME CALLING FROM YOU.  WE ARE ALL MAKING JUDGMENTAL (NOTICED YOUR SPELLING PROBLEM AGAIN) DECISIONS ABOUT CANDIDATES AND RIGHTLY SO.  Who tried to scare you?  YOU SAID IN POST OF 10/15: “I would take you, Sharman and your “reasonable assumptions” in front of a jury and own you.  Ask Mike if I am not correct.”  I RESPONDED: “OH, YOU SCARE ME, BY CALLING ME NAMES, AND TALKING DOWN TO ME.  SO YOU’D “OWN ME” HUH?”
Who said “to dumb to ask”?  I DID. MY EXACT QUOTE IS: There’s a saying for people that don’t know how to ask the right questions…and that is ‘they’re too dumb to know the questions to ask’.  END QUOTE.  Are you now starting to make stuff up?  I SEE THIS HAS BEEN ONE OF YOUR PROBLEMS ALL ALONG AND THAT IS COMPREHENSION, READING, AND A FEW GRAMATICAL ERRORS TOO—SUCH AS WORD DEFINITIONS AND SPELLING.  I said you were unwilling to ask because you don’t weant to find out that something you WANT to believe may not be true.  THIS IS A NAIVE STATEMENT TO ACCUSE ME OF, WHEN YOU CANNOT PROVE IT WITH FACTS, AND YOU DON’T KNOW ME OTHER THAN WHAT I POST.  IF YOU KNEW WHAT I DID FOR A LIVING, YOU WOULD KNOW THIS COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE TRUE, BUT I WON’T TELL YOU BECAUSE I LIKE TO READ YOUR ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT ME, AND OTHERS WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU.
The “diversions” are not off topic but actually parallels that show your inconsistency in logic and application of fairness.  OH, SO YOU WANT TO TEST MY LOGIC AND INTELLIGENCE, INSTEAD OF ABOUT THE FACTS OF THE ACTUAL ARTICLE HUH?  YOU SEE, WHAT I’VE NOTICED ABOUT YOU, IS THAT THE MOMENT SOMEONE OPPOSES YOU, WITH CLEAR AND FACTUAL DATA, THAT NO ONE HAS DISPROVEN TO THIS MOMENT, YOU RUN OFF ON ANOTHER TANGENT, BUT BASICALLY CONTINUING THE SAME NASTY WAY OF TALKING DOWN AND CALLING NAMES.  AND THIS I FIND HAPPENS WITH PEOPLE WHO WANT TO DEFEND SOMETHING IN WHICH THERE IS NO MOREE TO DEFEND.  THERE’S JUST HISTORY, AND YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO RE-WRITE IT TO SUIT YOUR OPINION OF SOMEONE.
“Fact checking” Sharman and determining if the logic of “if so, then” are two different things.  SO THAT EXPLAINS HOW YOU FACT CHECK!  OK, NOW SINCE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU SAID ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, THEN IT’S SAFE TO SAY THAT YOU DID NOT FIND ANY FACTUAL ERRORS LIKE ME IN MY FACT CHECKING, YOU LIKE TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER LEVEL, THIS MAKING YOUR QUESTIONS UP.  WHICH IS WHERE I TRIED TO STOP YOU BECAUSE THE QUESTIONS YOU CAME UP WITH— WERE NOT RELEVANT, WERE SUBJECTIVE, AMBIGUOUS, AND WERE NOT ABOUT THE SUBJECT MATTER AT HAND.  You proved you don’t know that since you won’t talk about a conservative organization that supports a known terrorist also supporting McCain. Yes, you are ignoring it.  Claiming you aren’t is total BS.  YOU WENT OFF ON A TANGENT AGAIN, THE FACT AT HAND WAS THAT THE MONEY WENT TO A KNOWN TERRORIST AS FUNNELED THROUGH THE HANDS OF OBAMA, NOT WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM OR WHO ELSE THEY MAY HAVE SUPPORTED.  FURTHERMORE, AYERS SO CALLED EDUCATIONAL IDEAS LINE UP WITH SOCIALISM – AND THAT IS ANOTHER REASON WHY I WOULD DISAGREE WITH ANY FUNDS GOING TO HIM, FROM WHO CARES WHERE.
I said I have voted for McCain every time I could which would also be when he ran.  The lie is you claiming to have checked Sharman’s facts.  You either didn’t and that’s a lie, or you did, but did it with no intention of applying logic or validity to the point (which is intellectually dishonest, a lie).  ONCE AGAIN, YOU CAN CALL ME A LIAR, BUT THAT’S LIKE TELLING THE WORLD YOU KNOW WHAT COLOR MY HAIR IS.  YOU DON’T KNOW ME.

AND, YOU’VE NEVER CITED ANY FACTS THAT CALL SHARMAN’S FACTS INTO QUESTIONS:  AGAIN, YOUR QUOTE: “Could be since I am finding all kinds of references that call Sharman’s facts into question.”  WHY WON’T YOU PROVIDE THEM, INSTEAD OF YOUR SILLY QUESTIONS?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( copper ) on October 16, 2008 at 10:04 am

Never said he was convicted, he got off on a technicality, but publicly admitting to it is good enough for me. Then he went one step farther and said “he wished he had done more”. Who did he hurt, seven police officers were severly injured in the bombing of the Police station. Maybe you should study the facts before shooting off your mouth. I guess you think it is OK to bomb government buildings and police stations? With that mindset you should ABSOLUTELY VOTE OBAMA, he doesn’t love America either!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( El Debibble ) on October 16, 2008 at 7:22 am

Alright copper, who were the “many people” injured in their bombings?  Best I can tell the bombings where people were injured/killed (other than when the idiots blew themselves up)were never claimed by them and the authorities never blamed them.  You were making points without making the stretch.  BTW - Ayers was never convicted of anything.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( El Debibble ) on October 16, 2008 at 6:40 am

rjma, I wish you hadn’t helped ordinarywoman out with how I voted for McCain.  I was waiting to see her supposed fact checking turn up the info you provided.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( El Debibble ) on October 16, 2008 at 6:30 am

Ordinarywoman, there is no way you would ever be a judge, judgemental yes, judge no. Who tried to scare you? 

Who said “to dumb to ask”?  Are you now starting to make stuff up?  I said you were unwilling to ask because you don’t weant to find out that something you WANT to believe may not be true.

The “diversions” are not off topic but actually parallels that show your inconsistency in logic and application of fairness.

“Fact checking” Sharman and determining if the logic of “if so, then” are two different things.  You proved you don’t know that since you won’t talk about a conservative organization that supports a known terrorist also supporting McCain. Yes, you are ignoring it.  Claiming you aren’t is total BS.

I said I have voted for McCain every time I could which would also be when he ran.  The lie is you claiming to have checked Sharman’s facts.  You either didn’t and that’s a lie, or you did, but did it with no intention of applying logic or validity to the point (which is intellectually dishonest, a lie).

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( copper ) on October 15, 2008 at 3:36 pm

Trust me rjma, I am NOT trying to convince you of anything, you are TRULY a kool-aid drinking democrat who won’t listen to anything. Your democrats Chris Dodd and Barney Franks along with Obamas advisor Raines,  created this mess and YOUR democrats have been in power for two years and look where it has gotten us, financial turmoil for giving loans to folks who should not have qualified for them in the first place. Of course you will continue to deny and blame Bush for everything, I could care less.  As far as comparing a teenager shoplifting to a DOMESTIC TERRORIST who injured many people bombing government buildings, you truly are out of touch with reality. But just so you know, if convicted of a felony when you are an adult, it WILL follow you the rest of your life, when you apply for jobs, want to buy a firearm, etc. So yes, YOU are responsible for what you do as an adult, whether you want to be or not!  GO McCAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( rjma ) on October 15, 2008 at 3:18 pm

Good now we’re getting somewhere. So then a shoplifter should not be called a thief 40 years after the fact?  Agreed?  So you agree that depending on the crime that a person shouldn’t be called a terrorist, thief, etc.  It just depends on the crime and the length of time.  So in your judgment when does Ayers lose his terrorist label?  Ever?  Do you really fear Ayers?  Think he is going set off another bomb any time soon.

Polls have not shown that typical voters are swayed by this.  Do you have a poll that shows otherwise?  Do you really think that people who are about to lose their house or their job are real concerned about Bill Ayers? I think they probably have other priorities.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( mst ) on October 15, 2008 at 3:01 pm

rjma, no one has ever said Ayers is a dummy. I think when two of his associates blew themselves up he decided he would be the man behind the terrorists. I’m sure he realized even then that one day he’d be a respected professor. Today, he’s the professor behind the voting fraud cases, embezzlement of gov’t funds, identity theft, etc. The crimes may change but the man behind the crimes is there until he dies or is knocked off by young, upstart senator groomed to take his place.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement